Suggestions for making Orca Browser even better go here. Note that Orca is no longer in development, and no new builds or versions of Orca are planned.
Moderators: Support Staff², Support Staff, AvantGuard, Developer
-
archaeum
- Newbie

- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:23 pm
- Windows Version: Vista Ultimate
- Avant Version: 11.7 b23
- IE Version: 7 is installed
Post
by archaeum » Thu May 20, 2010 7:21 am
I know all of this was only just announced yesterday at Google I/O, but with pretty much every single browser (incl MS IE) hopping on this bandwagon, I was curious what Orca Devs might do in response. I don't know how this extra support is wired into Firefox if it's an engine thing or a plugin thing, so I can't comment on that. But it would be nice to know that you guys will keep up on the standards wavefront, or at least a couple steps right behind it.
here's a link to the project.
http://www.webmproject.org/
-
André
- Administrator

- Posts: 5787
- Joined: Sat Dec 14, 1901 3:19 am
- Windows Version: Windows 7 x64
- Avant Version:
- Location: Baltimore and McHenry, Maryland, USA
-
Contact:
Post
by André » Sat May 22, 2010 1:26 am
I don't know enough about it's actual implementation in Firefox but let's not count our chickens before they hatch. There is already a patent pool being talked about for WebM. This POTENTIALLY could put it in the same boat as h.264. Google is sticking it's head out on this one, for good reasons mind you, to try and get a high quality, open source, and unencumbered video encoding/decoding format for everyone to use.
Desktop:
Intel C2Q Q9550 @ 3.7GHz || 8GiBs DDR2 800 @ 435MHz || Asus P5E
112 GiB SSD || 931 GiB HDD || 2x ATI 5770 in CrossfireX || Picture
NetBook:
ASUS Eee PC 1000HE || 1.66 GHz Atom N280 || 2 GiB DDR2 667 || 320 GiB HDD
NAS:
Intel E5200 @ 2.632 GHz || 4 GiB DDR2 800 @ 421 MHz || Foxconn G31MXP-K
5.45 TiB RAID 6
-
archaeum
- Newbie

- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:23 pm
- Windows Version: Vista Ultimate
- Avant Version: 11.7 b23
- IE Version: 7 is installed
Post
by archaeum » Mon May 24, 2010 12:53 am
Yeah I had since heard about the disputes over the tech, but not until after I posted this lol. I didn't mean to imply it was a bandwagon you had to jump onto, just what the development's thoughts and potential plans for this and new standards. You know, like what your general adoption policy is. But I guess that's kind of hard to describe, depends on so much. So, nevermind and keep up the good work
